https://www.opensourceway.blog/tags/%E5%88%B6%E5%BA%A6%E7%BB%8F%E6%B5%8E%E5%AD%A6/Recent content in 制度经济学 on 「开源之道」Hugozh-CNCopyright (c) 2016 - 2026, 「开源之道」·适兕; all rights reserved.Mon, 10 Aug 2026 20:25:06 +0800https://www.opensourceway.blog/posts/issues-musings/bitter-lesson-institutional-internalization/Mon, 10 Aug 2026 20:25:06 +0800https://www.opensourceway.blog/posts/issues-musings/bitter-lesson-institutional-internalization/【思想札记】The Bitter Lesson 与制度内化的同一机制——从 AI Harness 到 Copyleft 的制度经济学分析https://www.opensourceway.blog/posts/osbook-book-recommendation/qin-hui-1994-chuantong-shilun-2026-07-28/Tue, 28 Jul 2026 07:00:00 +0800https://www.opensourceway.blog/posts/osbook-book-recommendation/qin-hui-1994-chuantong-shilun-2026-07-28/没有对照系就无法认识自己——秦晖的&#39;对照系方法论&#39;，是理解中国开源制度文化背景的一面镜子。https://www.opensourceway.blog/posts/osbook-book-recommendation/violence-and-social-orders-north-wallis-weingast/Fri, 24 Jul 2026 07:00:00 +0800https://www.opensourceway.blog/posts/osbook-book-recommendation/violence-and-social-orders-north-wallis-weingast/<h2 id="今日推荐书籍">今日推荐书籍</h2> <p><strong>《Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History》</strong> — Douglass C. North, John J. Wallis &amp; Barry R. Weingast（2009）</p> <figure> <img loading="lazy" src="https://www.opensourceway.blog/media/violence-and-social-orders-2026-07-24.svg" alt="推荐卡片" width="400"/> </figure> <h2 id="推荐语">推荐语</h2> <p>为什么有些社会能够实现持续的繁荣，而有些社会长期陷于停滞甚至倒退？North、Wallis 与 Weingast 三位诺贝尔经济学奖得主共同给出的答案是：<strong>关键在于社会如何组织对暴力（权力）的控制。</strong></p>https://www.opensourceway.blog/posts/osbook-book-recommendation/how-not-to-network-a-nation-peters/Thu, 23 Jul 2026 07:00:00 +0800https://www.opensourceway.blog/posts/osbook-book-recommendation/how-not-to-network-a-nation-peters/<h2 id="今日推荐书籍">今日推荐书籍</h2> <p><strong>《How Not to Network a Nation: The Uneasy History of the Soviet Internet》</strong> — Benjamin Peters（2016）</p> <figure> <img loading="lazy" src="https://www.opensourceway.blog/media/how-not-to-network-a-nation-peters-2026-07-23.svg" alt="推荐卡片" width="400"/> </figure> <h2 id="推荐语">推荐语</h2> <p>为什么互联网诞生于美国，而非苏联？在一个同样拥有顶尖数学家和工程师、同样投入了巨额国家资源的超级大国，为什么计算机网络的梦想最终以失败告终？</p>https://www.opensourceway.blog/posts/osbook-book-recommendation/power-and-progress-acemoglu-johnson/Thu, 23 Jul 2026 07:00:00 +0800https://www.opensourceway.blog/posts/osbook-book-recommendation/power-and-progress-acemoglu-johnson/<h2 id="今日推荐书籍">今日推荐书籍</h2> <p><strong>《Power and Progress: Our 1000-Year Struggle Over Technology and Prosperity》</strong> — Daron Acemoglu &amp; Simon Johnson（2023）</p> <figure> <img loading="lazy" src="https://www.opensourceway.blog/media/power-and-progress-acemoglu-johnson-2026-07-23.svg" alt="推荐卡片" width="400"/> </figure> <h2 id="推荐语">推荐语</h2> <p>我们生活在一个被技术叙事包围的时代。从「AI 将取代所有工作」到「去中心化技术将解放人类」，从「代码即法律」到「算法中立」——技术变革的叙事塑造着我们的预期、投资和政策。但一个根本性的问题被忽略了：<strong>技术发展的方向是谁决定的？技术带来的红利流向何处？</strong></p>https://www.opensourceway.blog/posts/osbook-book-recommendation/dahlander-magnusson-2005-oss-companies-communities/Tue, 21 Jul 2026 07:00:00 +0800https://www.opensourceway.blog/posts/osbook-book-recommendation/dahlander-magnusson-2005-oss-companies-communities/<h2 id="今日推荐论文">今日推荐论文</h2> <p><strong>《Relationships between Open Source Software Companies and Communities: Observations from Nordic Firms》</strong> — Linus Dahlander &amp; Mats G. Magnusson，发表于 <em>Research Policy</em> 34(4)，2005 年 5 月，第 481-493 页</p> <figure> <img loading="lazy" src="https://www.opensourceway.blog/media/dahlander-magnusson-2005-oss-companies-communities-2026-07-21.svg" alt="推荐卡片" width="400"/> </figure> <h2 id="为什么是这篇论文">为什么是这篇论文</h2> <p>在 OSPO（开源项目办公室）和企业参与开源的理论谱系中，Dahlander &amp; Magnusson（2005）这篇论文占据着一个<strong>起点性的位置</strong>。它是企业-社区关系研究领域中被引用最多的经典文献之一，也是最早系统地对「企业如何与开源社区互动」这一命题进行类型学建模的研究。</p>https://www.opensourceway.blog/posts/osbook-book-recommendation/why-nations-fail-acemoglu-robinson/Mon, 20 Jul 2026 07:00:00 +0800https://www.opensourceway.blog/posts/osbook-book-recommendation/why-nations-fail-acemoglu-robinson/<h2 id="今日推荐书籍">今日推荐书籍</h2> <p><strong>《Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty》</strong> — Daron Acemoglu &amp; James A. Robinson（2012）</p> <figure> <img loading="lazy" src="https://www.opensourceway.blog/media/why-nations-fail-acemoglu-robinson-2026-07-20.svg" alt="推荐卡片" width="400"/> </figure> <h2 id="推荐语">推荐语</h2> <p>为什么有的国家繁荣，有的国家停滞？为什么工业革命发生在英国而非中国或印度？为什么韩国与朝鲜，一墙之隔，却走向了截然不同的命运？</p>https://www.opensourceway.blog/posts/osbook-book-recommendation/governing-the-commons/Sat, 18 Jul 2026 07:00:00 +0800https://www.opensourceway.blog/posts/osbook-book-recommendation/governing-the-commons/<h2 id="今日推荐书籍">今日推荐书籍</h2> <p><strong>《Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action》</strong> — Elinor Ostrom（1990）</p> <figure> <img loading="lazy" src="https://www.opensourceway.blog/media/governing-the-commons-2026-07-18.svg" alt="推荐卡片" width="400"/> </figure> <h2 id="推荐语">推荐语</h2> <p>当 Hardin 的「公地悲剧」被奉为铁律时，Ostrom 选择了一条更艰难的道路——她走进瑞士的阿尔卑斯牧场、日本的森林、菲律宾的灌溉系统、西班牙的 huerta，用实证研究追问：<strong>人类是否真的无法自主管理公共资源？</strong></p>https://www.opensourceway.blog/posts/issues-musings/rewrite-open-source-history/Sat, 21 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000https://www.opensourceway.blog/posts/issues-musings/rewrite-open-source-history/从一个微观的开发者聚会起笔，穿透底层的文化基因与国家的制度焦虑，探讨数字时代利维坦如何走向热寂，以及在系统废墟上重写开源史的必要性。