https://www.opensourceway.blog/tags/ccsioa-standardisation-association-convening-monopoly/Recent content in Ccsioa-Standardisation-Association-Convening-Monopoly on 「开源之道」Hugozh-CNCopyright (c) 2016 - 2026, 「开源之道」·适兕; all rights reserved.Thu, 22 Oct 2026 01:32:39 +0800https://www.opensourceway.blog/en/posts/china-open-source-daily/2026/10/2026-10-22/Thu, 22 Oct 2026 01:32:39 +0800https://www.opensourceway.blog/en/posts/china-open-source-daily/2026/10/2026-10-22/Two documents from the same week describe two different ways an institution can accumulate authority over a technical field, and the distance between them is the finding. On 2026-10-20 the OSCAR Trustworthy Open Source account published the programme for the 2026 OSCAR Open Source Industry Conference (Beijing, 2026-11-10), hosted by the China Communications Standards Association and organised by CAICT, whose six headline items are almost entirely apparatus rather than findings: the release of a trust-evaluation result set, the launch of a six-networks open-IoT standards system, the founding of an AI Infra software expert group, two new China Institute of Communications standards (a transparency grading method for open LLMs and a governance maturity model for enterprise open-LLM adoption), and the annual research reports. Five days earlier, openEuler occupied the largest distro booth at Open Source Summit Europe 2026 in Prague, presented a SuperPoD OS and agentic-scaling roadmap in a Technical Committee keynote, and — in the one detail that carries the institutional weight — is a downstream that diverged rather than a downstream that reconstructed. The two artefacts are read here side by side because they are rival mechanisms: one manufactures standing through assessment and standardisation, the other through having been forced to stop depending on upstream.