<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Deepseek-80-Billion-Yuan-Pre-Ipo-Round-October-2026-Target-100-Billion-Yuan on 「开源之道」</title><link>https://www.opensourceway.blog/tags/deepseek-80-billion-yuan-pre-ipo-round-october-2026-target-100-billion-yuan/</link><description>Recent content in Deepseek-80-Billion-Yuan-Pre-Ipo-Round-October-2026-Target-100-Billion-Yuan on 「开源之道」</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>zh-CN</language><copyright>Copyright (c) 2016 - 2026, 「开源之道」·适兕; all rights reserved.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 01:33:32 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.opensourceway.blog/tags/deepseek-80-billion-yuan-pre-ipo-round-october-2026-target-100-billion-yuan/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>China Open Source Daily — 2026-10-10</title><link>https://www.opensourceway.blog/en/posts/china-open-source-daily/2026/10/2026-10-10/</link><pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 01:33:32 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://www.opensourceway.blog/en/posts/china-open-source-daily/2026/10/2026-10-10/</guid><description>Three institutionally dense placements on the same unsolved institutional object this series&amp;#39; prior fifty briefings have been documenting — the pre-IPO governance form of a Chinese frontier AI lab — and all three placements this cycle&amp;#39;s briefing documents sit at institutional layers this series&amp;#39; prior briefings have not documented at before. (1) Bloomberg&amp;#39;s October 6, 2026 reporting on DeepSeek&amp;#39;s approaching pre-IPO round of at least ¥80 billion (approximately US$11.93 billion), originally targeted at ¥50 billion with a target valuation of ¥500 billion (approximately US$74 billion), with China&amp;#39;s largest battery maker CATL and Tencent Holdings as the largest two committed investors, paired with Sina/RFI/iHeima&amp;#39;s re-reporting that DeepSeek is preparing to file for a STAR-board IPO in 2027 via CITIC Securities, paired with the Sina/Phoenix Tech piece&amp;#39;s documentation that the June 2026 first external round of approximately ¥50 billion-plus (approximately US$7.4 billion) was executed as a limited-partnership structure with external investors holding no voting rights and a five-year lockup while Liang Wenfeng personally contributed approximately ¥20 billion and retained close to 100 percent of voting rights. (2) Hongxing/Red Star News&amp;#39;s October 6, 2026 reporting on Moonshot AI (月之暗面) completing its final pre-IPO round at a valuation of approximately US$50 billion, positioning for a Q1 2027 Hong Kong Exchange listing, paired with the Sina/Hongxing documentation that Moonshot AI has completed the business-registration change from &amp;#34;limited liability company&amp;#34; to &amp;#34;joint stock company&amp;#34; as a pre-IPO procedural signal, paired with the piece&amp;#39;s documentation of Moonshot&amp;#39;s six funding rounds in the first half of 2026 with valuation rising from US$10 billion to US$35 billion across January-to-July (with the final round lifting the valuation to approximately US$50 billion) and Moonshot&amp;#39;s June 2026 annual recurring revenue (ARR) breaking through US$300 million on the back of Kimi K3&amp;#39;s launch. (3) Sina/Phoenix Tech&amp;#39;s documentation that during National Day holiday 2026 DeepSeek Harness released a new version with plugin and cross-platform enhancements including an experimental Claude Code Mods compatibility layer, paired with DeepSeek Harness head Cui Tianyi&amp;#39;s October 4, 2026 social-media statement that &amp;#34;the main purpose of building this compatibility layer is to verify whether the extension capabilities Claude Code Mods offers plugin authors are roughly a subset of the capabilities provided by DSH&amp;#39;s everything-is-a-plugin architecture&amp;#34;, and paired with Cui Tianyi&amp;#39;s own statement that &amp;#34;a fairly large portion of my daily working time is spent recruiting and interviewing for DeepSeek; DeepSeek&amp;#39;s goal is to achieve AGI, and DeepSeek Harness&amp;#39;s goal is to advance AGI from the Harness angle.&amp;#34; The institutional-economics question this cycle&amp;#39;s briefing documents but does not answer: whether the pre-IPO governance form of Chinese frontier AI labs — the DeepSeek-limited-partnership-plus-99-percent-voting-rights-plus-five-year-lockup structure and the Moonshot-limited-liability-to-joint-stock-conversion-plus-dual-track-Hong-Kong-and-Star-board-IPO structure — is the institutional-form object this series&amp;#39; prior briefings&amp;#39; Great Divergence 2.0 framework should be extended to cover, and whether the DeepSeek Harness Claude Code Mods compatibility-layer layer operationalizes the same open-source-vs-institutional-form boundary object this series&amp;#39; prior briefings have documented at the OpenHarmony AI-tool-use-rulebook layer and the CANN-community-open-source-development layer.</description></item></channel></rss>