<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Enclosure on 「开源之道」</title><link>https://www.opensourceway.blog/tags/enclosure/</link><description>Recent content in Enclosure on 「开源之道」</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>zh-CN</language><copyright>Copyright (c) 2016 - 2026, 「开源之道」·适兕; all rights reserved.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2026 04:35:51 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.opensourceway.blog/tags/enclosure/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>2026-10-22 「开源之道」·论文略读：圈的是地，还是圈地的权利？——第二次圈地运动与公共领域的建构</title><link>https://www.opensourceway.blog/posts/osbook-book-recommendation/boyle-2003-second-enclosure-movement-2026-10-22/</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2026 04:35:51 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://www.opensourceway.blog/posts/osbook-book-recommendation/boyle-2003-second-enclosure-movement-2026-10-22/</guid><description>Boyle（杜克法学院，Law and Contemporary Problems 66:33-74, 2003）把数字时代的知识产权扩张命名为「第二次圈地运动」，并给出了一个比「反版权」更硬的判断：真正的危机不是公地被过度使用，而是公地被过度圈占；而公共领域必须像「环境」一样先被发明出来，才可能被拯救。对开源而言，这意味着开源许可证不是在放弃产权，而是在重新划定产权边界——但当许可证被证明管不住分发渠道与构建流水线时，圈地已经换了战场。</description></item></channel></rss>