<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Governance-Models on 「开源之道」</title><link>https://www.opensourceway.blog/tags/governance-models/</link><description>Recent content in Governance-Models on 「开源之道」</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>zh-CN</language><copyright>Copyright (c) 2016 - 2026, 「开源之道」·适兕; all rights reserved.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2026 04:32:16 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.opensourceway.blog/tags/governance-models/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>2026-11-08 「开源之道」·论文略读：一张治理的图纸，和它省掉的那一行</title><link>https://www.opensourceway.blog/posts/osbook-book-recommendation/ivchenko-2026-community-governance-xai-trustworthiness-2026-11-08/</link><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2026 04:32:16 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://www.opensourceway.blog/posts/osbook-book-recommendation/ivchenko-2026-community-governance-xai-trustworthiness-2026-11-08/</guid><description>一篇 12.5 kB 的预印本声称从 15 篇文献里编码出六种治理模型，还对 312 人做了李克特量表调查——而它的参考书目由「出版流水线自动生成」，编码脚本的仓库里没有这篇研究。它是一张治理的图纸，同时也是一份关于「该查什么」的示范：五条要点（审计、决策日志、透明、参与、认证），删掉一行控制字数，于是把最难的那三件事一起删掉了。</description></item></channel></rss>