Innovation-Commons

一篇尚未正式发表的 SSRN 工作论文，用「成本驱动的治理」框架解剖炬腾与 OpenHarmony 两个中国开源项目，把新制度经济学的交易成本框架第一次系统性地搬进中国开源语境——不是「开源为什么在中国不同」的修辞，而是「不同具体体现在哪一层的成本结构」的实证解剖。

Reuters via the Korea Economic Daily documents that People’s Daily — the official mouthpiece of China’s ruling Communist Party — has joined Moonshot AI’s investor roster alongside a national AI fund, deepening the institutional-media-and-sovereign-capital penetration into a pre-IPO frontier-AI lab that was founded as a private venture thirteen months earlier; CEPA publishes ‘AI Confusion: Washington Struggles to Respond to China’ (August 13), an institutional critique arguing that the proposed U.S. ban on Chinese open-weight models rests on an unstated institutional premise — that China’s open-weight models are structurally alien to the open-source commons — and that this premise is false; The Conversation publishes Christopher K. Tong’s ‘China is shaping the future of open-source technology — including AI’ (August 12), the first academic article to frame Chinese open-source policy as a standards-setting project rather than a sovereignty narrative; Global Times publishes ‘China advances global AI governance on all fronts’ (August 14), formalizing the World AI Cooperation Organization’s agenda as a standards-export vector rather than a diplomatic initiative; a preprint on SSRN — ‘Cost-Driven Governance in Open-Source AI Innovation Commons: Comparative Evidence from Jittor and OpenHarmony in China’ — advances the first formal academic model of cost-driven governance as an organizational logic of Chinese open source.

以规则（rules）为分析基本单位的演化经济学通论——开源社区的协作，正是规则变异、采纳与传播的经济演化样本。