<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>OpenCourant on 「开源之道」</title><link>https://www.opensourceway.blog/tags/opencourant/</link><description>Recent content in OpenCourant on 「开源之道」</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>zh-CN</language><copyright>Copyright (c) 2016 - 2026, 「开源之道」·适兕; all rights reserved.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2026 04:31:37 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.opensourceway.blog/tags/opencourant/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>2026-10-20 「开源之道」·荐书：度量权的上游——当数字不再能被复算</title><link>https://www.opensourceway.blog/posts/osbook-book-recommendation/url-advisory-metrics-capture-2026-10-20/</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2026 04:31:37 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://www.opensourceway.blog/posts/osbook-book-recommendation/url-advisory-metrics-capture-2026-10-20/</guid><description>Rodriguez/Kannan/Chepuri（SSRN 7629481）的 advisory 计数论文，与 GitHub 官方 2026-06-29 博文、NIST 2026-04-15 NVD 运营变更、Kubernetes 2026/2025 两份公开选票、OpenCourant 关停仓库、LF BUILD Foundation 新闻稿并置读：论文摘要里的六个数能不能独立成立，取决于是谁定义了口径。K8s 选举可以用公开数据与公开源码重算出与公告一致的答案；advisory 计数不能。结论不是「谁在造假」，而是——度量权不表现为禁止，表现为问题被预先切好了；而一个治理机制能否被相信，取决于它是否允许被怀疑。</description></item></channel></rss>