<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Osaid on 「开源之道」</title><link>https://www.opensourceway.blog/tags/osaid/</link><description>Recent content in Osaid on 「开源之道」</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>zh-CN</language><copyright>Copyright (c) 2016 - 2026, 「开源之道」·适兕; all rights reserved.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2026 04:30:00 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.opensourceway.blog/tags/osaid/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>2026-10-29 「开源之道」·论文略读：当「开源」需要用户先说明自己要干什么——十六位专家口中的 openness 与它身上的那架权力跷跷板 — Juntura &amp; Eloranta</title><link>https://www.opensourceway.blog/posts/osbook-book-recommendation/juntura-eloranta-2025-beyond-open-washing-2026-10-29/</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2026 04:30:00 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://www.opensourceway.blog/posts/osbook-book-recommendation/juntura-eloranta-2025-beyond-open-washing-2026-10-29/</guid><description>同一批专家，被问到「什么叫开源 LLM」时给不出统一答案；被问到「你打算拿它干什么」时，答案立刻一致。他们说的不是同一件事有两套标准，而是 openness 本来就有两套量法——一套量资源，一套量人。前言里那句「开放性可能反而加固既有的权力结构」，才是这篇论文真正想说的。</description></item></channel></rss>