<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Revenue-Feedback on 「开源之道」</title><link>https://www.opensourceway.blog/tags/revenue-feedback/</link><description>Recent content in Revenue-Feedback on 「开源之道」</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>zh-CN</language><copyright>Copyright (c) 2016 - 2026, 「开源之道」·适兕; all rights reserved.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 04:32:09 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.opensourceway.blog/tags/revenue-feedback/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>2026-09-02 「开源之道」·论文略读：收入反馈制度范式 — Pacheco, Garrido &amp; Fernández Domingos</title><link>https://www.opensourceway.blog/posts/osbook-book-recommendation/pacheco-2026-revenue-feedback-global-risky-commons/</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 04:32:09 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://www.opensourceway.blog/posts/osbook-book-recommendation/pacheco-2026-revenue-feedback-global-risky-commons/</guid><description>Pacheco, Garrido &amp;amp; Fernández Domingos (2026, J. R. Soc. Interface 23(241):20260508) 用集体风险困境（CRD）博弈论框架，把『全球风险公地治理的资金从哪来』从会计问题升格为制度经济学问题，提出『收入反馈』（revenue-feedback, RF）范式：制度从自身运行中内生地生成资源并实施奖惩，而非依赖外部拨款。本文从适兕反复强调的『大分流 2.0』视角追问：开源基金会是 RF 范式的天然实证，而行政拨款驱动的治理则是其结构性反面——什么条件下治理制度能内生出自身资源，是制度变迁的关键观察点。</description></item></channel></rss>